Channeling Baghdad Bob
By: Bernie GoldbergMarch 24, 2017
Archive
Comment
Email
Print
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Channeling Baghdad Bob

I almost feel sorry for Sean Spicer.  I mean the poor guy’s got a tough job. Defending the indefensible isn’t easy. Especially when you’re doing it in front of a bunch of people who detest your boss.

I’m starting to think that Spicer is channeling another well-known press flack. Perhaps you remember him – he went by the name of Baghdad Bob, Saddam Hussein’s Information Minister; the guy who had to say the most ridiculous things in defense of his boss.

Baghdad Bob would say stuff that no sane person could believe, like American soldiers were committing suicide inside Iraq “by the hundreds” – and that U.S. troops were on the verge of surrendering while in reality they were on the verge of demolishing what passed for Iraq’s army.

Sean Spicer doesn’t say anything that crazy. I mean defending his boss’s tweet that President Obama was bugging Trump Tower during the presidential campaign isn’t confusing fantasy with reality. Wait. What?

And when Spicer defended his boss’s claim that his inauguration crowd was way bigger than it really was, it’s not as if Sean Spicer stood at his podium, looked reporters in the eye, and said “This was the largest audience to witness an inauguration, period. Both in person and around the globe.”  Oops. I forgot. He really did say that.

And when Donald Trump said that 3 to 5 million illegal immigrants voted in the presidential election Sean Spicer once again rode to the rescue.

“The president does believe that … based on studies and evidence that people have presented to him,” he told reporters. Too bad neither the president nor his press secretary presented any evidence to support the claim – because there was none.

And just because Paul Manafort, the former chairman of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, was linked to pro-Russian Ukrainians, was Spicer wrong to say that Manafort “Played a very limited role for a very limited amount of time” in Trump’s run for the White House?

Well, let’s ask the very same Sean Spicer. In June, when Manafort took over Trump’s campaign and Spicer was the mouthpiece for the Republican National Committee, he told the Reuters news agency that, “Paul’s in charge.”

Hey, let’s cut the flack some slack. “In charge” can mean all sorts of things, right? 

Spicer is not Donald Trump’s Baghdad Bob. I know this because Wikipedia says Baghdad Bob’s “announcements were met with widespread derision and amusement.” I’ve watched a lot of Spicer’s confrontations with the press at his daily briefing. Derision? Ok. Amusement? Not so much.

But it’s unfair, of course, to be too tough on press secretaries. I mean Bagdad Bob had a pretty tough boss. He had to say what he had to say. Which brings us to CNN’s Dana Bash who recently said that Spicer “has to say” what he has to say, “because he knows that he has an audience of one, the President of the United States, at this point, that’s really his focus. It’s pretty obvious.”

Sure, that’s easy for Dana Bash to say. What’s Sean Spicer supposed to do? Go out and tell the White House press corps, “I know — and you know — that President Trump gets a lot of things wrong. I know — and you know — he’s impulsive and every now and then just plain makes stuff up. Who knows, maybe, from time to time, he even lies. I don’t like it anymore than you do. I’m just a guy with a family trying to earn a living doing my job – defending the indefensible. Now, let’s go to your questions.”

I don’t think so.

The late Tony Snow, who served as President George W. Bush’s press secretary, once said, “If it got to the point where I thought it would cost me my credibility, I would have no choice but to walk away.”

And Spicer, a likeable man with a good sense of humor, also has given some thought to his own credibility. “If you lose the respect and trust of the press corps, then you got nothing,” he said.

Finally, a statement from Spicer that the White House press corps actually thinks makes sense.

Permit me to go highbrow for my final thought. In Robert Bolt’s play “A Man for All Seasons,” Thomas More is betrayed by Richard Rich, a corrupt little weasel who commits perjury against Sir Thomas to please the king. In exchange, Rich is named attorney general for Wales (which is akin to being named dog catcher of New Jersey).

To this, Thomas More says: “Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. … But for Wales?”

Or for that matter, Sean Spicer … for Donald Trump?