|
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, November 19, 2009
With the possible exceptions of Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, no politician of the modern era has been more derided by the media than Sarah Palin. And the attacks did not stop with her; they included nasty rumors about her family and even the mocking of her children.
Now, Mrs. Palin has responded to some of the vitriol in her new book, hoping to give readers her side of controversies like the expensive clothes, the interview gaffes, and the Alaskan "trooper-gate" case.
So, how has the media received the governor's side of the story? Not well. She is being called a whiner and an ingrate, among other things.
Writing in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, über-liberal Cynthia Tucker says, "There is absolutely nothing in Sarah Palin's past that suggested she was ever going to let the past go. She's always been petty. She's always been vindictive."
So let's get this straight: Media people like Ms. Tucker can hammer Sarah Palin all day long, but if she defends herself, she's "petty and vindictive."
Isn't the American media swell? By the way, it is worth noting that the left has not been able to knock Governor Palin out, despite trying very hard. A study by the Culture and Media Institute looked at a two-week period during last year's campaign. During that time, the network nightly newscasts ran 18 negative stories about candidate Palin for every positive one. Fair and balanced? Give me a break.
Somehow, Sarah Palin has gotten under the skin of the far left. The latest propaganda was put forth by feminist Naomi Wolf and crazy-left Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson who, independently, have dubbed Mrs. Palin the "new Evita." Now, what are the odds of Ms. Wolf and Mr. Robinson, who operate worlds apart, both referencing the Argentine Eva Perón at pretty much the same time? Coincidence? Sure.
Eva Perón was a demagogue who appealed to the common man. She was also an incompetent leader. The song "Don't Cry for Me, Argentina" has immortalized her.
So, I am expecting a new song to be sung by Bruce Springsteen entitled: "Don't Cry for Me, Wasilla, Alaska." I hope the lyrics aren't whiney.
My theory is that liberal America fears Sarah Palin. Even though a CBS News poll has her approval rating at just 23%, a whopping 37% say they are still undecided about the governor. That means that millions of Americans are potential converts to her populist cause—bad news for the left if the country turns against the Obama administration.
Thus, the liberal media is hunting Mrs. Palin, trying to drive a stake through her heart once and for all. But the woman is tough, wily, and unafraid. She's driving them crazy.
##
|
| Messages are displayed in reverse chronological order, with the most recent posts displayed first.
Log in as a Premium Member to add a comment
and share your thoughts with other BillOReilly.com Premium Members. |
ardvaark65 said:
I AM QUALIFIED TO BE THE PRESIDENT! "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States." I am a citizen, I am over 35 years and have lived in the US all of my life! I am therefore qualified to be president. The rest of the BS is just that BS. Presidents are nothing more than figureheads, Congress does all the work! ----------------- The President sets the agenda. However, I do agree that Greg's dog would make a better President than Barak, or better Congressman than any of the libs there now.
Dang shame about that age requirement....
--The Angry Klingon-- When someone online asks me for a favor, and uses the word "plz" because it's shorter than "please", I always answer "no" because it's shorter than "yes".
|
| Posted by AngryKlingon on November 24, 2009 at 8:58 PM |
|
I don't have a problem with fact checks. It is also endlessly humorous that members of the media felt the need to fact check SNL. Talk about Kool Aid.
Sure wish they'd spend some of that time and energy fact-checking Joe Biden.
Just take any comment at random, doesn't matter.
--The Angry Klingon-- When someone online asks me for a favor, and uses the word "plz" because it's shorter than "please", I always answer "no" because it's shorter than "yes".
|
| Posted by AngryKlingon on November 24, 2009 at 8:51 PM |
|
Glenn Beck is a regular guy that loves his country and is a conservative. The elite HATE him because HE is exposing them for what they are...Elitist who believe they are so much smarter and refined than the average American.
The same rule applies to Sarah Palin except they are more fearful because she is in the political arena. They are so fearful she may be elected to a high political office and that would destroy their progressive/liberal agenda.
Even though George Bush had an Ivy League education, he spoke like a regular American and not like a intellectual. George W. was not a great speaker but I believe a great leader. Because he wasn't a elitist, he was destroyed by the elitist media.
Sarah Palin on the other hand IS a excellent communicator that connects with millions of Americans.
All good points, but there is a common denominator. The left sees traditional American values as a relic of an uneducated, unenlightened age. W, Sarah and Beck overflows with those values. President Reagan was hated for them. George the Elder was snickered at for them. If you're making a difference, and you hold those values, you earn their disdain at the very least, hatred at the most. --The Angry Klingon-- When someone online asks me for a favor, and uses the word "plz" because it's shorter than "please", I always answer "no" because it's shorter than "yes".
|
| Posted by AngryKlingon on November 24, 2009 at 8:48 PM |
|
Who would you invite to Thanksgiving dinner - Sarah Palin and Family or Martha Steward and Daughter, "yuk". RA When will the libs realize they are swimming in a sea of obamaism? Sarah is riding the tides of the oceans, pumped up by all of the hard working American People. Sarah said, "she does not have to be the top, she would step aside." For whom, Orielly, maybe Glen Beck?
Sarah and family especially Trig!:-D
Oreilly or Beck, ok for the dinner, h@@@ no for her steping aside! No way would I ever vote for O'Reilly. O'Reilly is ok to watch but he has a lot of opinions that I do not share. Maybe for Beck as the VP, but I would have to think long and hard about that.
|
| Posted by ardvaark65 on November 24, 2009 at 6:29 PM |
|
Who would you invite to Thanksgiving dinner - Sarah Palin and Family or Martha Steward and Daughter, "yuk". RA When will the libs realize they are swimming in a sea of obamaism? Sarah is riding the tides of the oceans, pumped up by all of the hard working American People. Sarah said, "she does not have to be the top, she would step aside." For whom, Orielly, maybe Glen Beck?
|
| Posted by RA on November 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM |
|
|
 |
|
Login as a Premium Member to see all comments, or buy a Premium Membership now
|
 |
|
|
|