|
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, September 2, 2010
One of the most under-reported ongoing stories around is the war in Mexico between the government and the drug cartels. Here are the grisly stats: More than 28,000 people have been killed in drug-related violence since 1996. In Iraq, 4,421 Americans have been killed. In Afghanistan, 1,141.
The truth is that Mexican drug merchants are even more deadly than al-Qaeda. They have more firepower, more money, and are just as willing to kill civilians as the homicidal jihadists. Yet we Americans know little about the chaotic situation south of the border.
The reason is that the drug cartels don't seem to threaten us directly. But, of course, they do. Illegal narcotics from Mexico wind up in almost every community in the United States. The FBI estimates that about 70% of crimes from coast-to-coast are drug-fueled.
The latest atrocity in the Mexican drug war was the discovery of 72 bodies on a ranch 100 miles south of Texas. The dead, 58 men and 14 women, were migrants from South and Central America. The lone survivor of the massacre says that cartel gunmen shot the unarmed folks because they resisted an extortion attempt.
The reliably anti-American New York Times partially blamed the mass killings on the USA: "Mexico's drug cartels are nourished from outside, by American cash, heavy weapons and addiction; the northward pull of immigrants is fueled by our demand for low-wage labor."
I had to read that editorial three times to believe it. Here we have the Times, which opposes putting the National Guard on the border, the tough anti-alien law in Arizona, and most other measures that might secure the border, complaining about the illegal gun and drug traffic. Can you believe this? Hey, you pinheads, if the United States would send ten thousand National Guardspeople to help the Border Patrol, drugs and guns would not be able to cross the border so easily. Comprende?
This entire grisly charade is infuriating. This country has the power to stop the smuggling of human beings and drugs across the southern border. We could do that. But we don't do it for political reasons. Meantime, the drug cartels kill at will and create terror on a scale not seen anywhere else on earth at this time.
Mexico itself is at fault because it won't ask for American help. Apparently, they think 28,000 dead is acceptable. Well, it's not. U.S. law enforcement and troops should be assisting Mexican authorities in the destruction of the cartels. The fact that these drug animals have been able to operate their murderous industry so openly for so long is beyond shameful.
When Manuel Noriega turned his country, Panama, into a narco-state in 1989, President Bush the Elder sent the Marines in to remove him. President Obama might study that campaign. Something needs to be done in Mexico.
##
|
| Messages are displayed in reverse chronological order, with the most recent posts displayed first.
Log in as a Premium Member to add a comment
and share your thoughts with other BillOReilly.com Premium Members. |
If my history memory is correct we have been to war with Mexico three times. Almost in 1917 and again in 1941 both times Mexico wanted to side with Germany but failed when the U.S. intercepted military messages of German supplying arms for an armed Mexican military invasion across.....our southern bourders. Santa Ana most famous of the Mexician Dictators had a wooden leg and turned traitor to the U.S. (after we paid him money for a guide) in 1846 after our invasion at Vera Cruz. The only significant military win was when the Mexican army defeated France thus establishing Cinco de Mayo....the only military battle ever won by the Mexican army. We all celebrate that one don't we? At one time the Mexican Army had 9000 officers and 7000 enlisted men....After Poncho Villa invaded the U.S. twice, he was chased for 300 miles into Mexico before he was caught and the Mexican Govenment never said a word. Go figure....Think they'd learn from their own failed history of messing with U.S.:-O
|
| Posted by Ironbunny on September 02, 2010 at 11:33 PM |
|
Sure our government will sue Joe Arpaio but not send enough troops to secure the border because shooting Mexican cartel members would be "racial profiling".
|
| Posted by Clyde H. on September 02, 2010 at 11:05 PM |
|
When the cartels come into the Southwest and begin killing Americans, maybe then our government will act. The loss of life in Mexico is totally unacceptable and our government failing to act to end the slaughter proves the politicians just want the power and money, to heck with any 'little people'. Wake up America, citizens need to act just like those in Arizona are attempting to.
|
| Posted by James L. on September 02, 2010 at 9:42 PM |
|
The propaganda in Arizona around what is and is not real because of the boarder situation is so bad that I have friends who think that crime is not really worse and that the border really is secure. While I have friends who are legally here from Mexico who are constantly asking us to pray for their families in Mexico because of the danger. It would be nice if the mainstream media would publish the truth. Because of how they twist and hide the truth, they should consider taking some of the blame!
|
| Posted by Melissa R. on September 02, 2010 at 7:21 PM |
|
We attack and declare war on countries in the recent past for similar atrocities. Why not here??????
The fat lady hasn't sung yet.
The drug wars haven't affected us much, no where near the scale as it is in Mexico. When it does, that's when we'll invade Mexico...again.
|
| Posted by Solidarność on September 02, 2010 at 7:11 PM |
|
|
 |
|
Login as a Premium Member to see all comments, or buy a Premium Membership now
|
 |
|