ACLU vs. Rumsfeld
Guests: Mike Posner, Human Rights First & Jonathan Turley, Georgetown University
"The American Civil Liberties Union and the group Human Rights First have filed a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on behalf of eight foreign men who claim they were tortured by US forces. Talking Points believes any violations of military law--torture, executions, false imprisonment--should be vigorously prosecuted. That being said, Talking Points also believes the ACLU is the most dangerous organization in the country and is trying to paralyze the federal government by suing over a bevy of anti-terror strategies. The ACLU is putting us all in danger by its fanatical opposition to fighting the war on terror. The ACLU opposes the Patriot Act and believes alleged terrorists wearing civilian clothing should have Geneva Convention rights and attorneys paid for by the American taxpayers. In fact, Talking Points could not find one proactive anti-terror measure that the ACLU supports. The executives who run the ACLU are very well paid, funded by billionaire George Soros and others. And the more bad things the ACLU can say about America, the more money comes rolling in. Get the picture? It is awful."
Transcript/Video: FoxNews.com
Two observers joined The Factor with different views on the lawsuit and its merits. "Thirty-seven people have died in US custody," said Mike Posner of Human Rights First. "This lawsuit is about something we should not countenance--torture and abuse of people in US custody. We want to see the rules changed so that rights are respected, and this lawsuit is a last resort." Jonathan Turley of Georgetown University said the lawsuit, while not without its merits, will probably be dismissed. "The federal courts are very hostile to the application of US laws to foreign nationals. It's the most difficult type of lawsuit you could possibly bring. But I'm glad the ACLU is there, and it takes courage to say unpopular things." The Factor again accused the ACLU and like-minded organizations of undermining the war on terror. "It's unreasonable to be against every proactive measure. Every measure to fight terror is opposed, and people are getting furious."